Miss Aniela Photography

On 9th July I gave a presentation on my work at the Microsoft Pro Photo Summit in Redmond. I had been invited to talk about photo-sharing and how it has impacted on my work and opened up some doors for me. During the presentation (20 mins with 10 mins for questions) I did as best I could to give a general introduction to myself and to describe my ‘journey’, as well as analyse what I think might be the elements to the way I work. I did this by breaking myself down into four factors, factors that may constitute ‘Miss Aniela’ but are also interesting and relevant to photography and art more generally, as we move with technology and try to think where these changes might lead us in the future. The four factors were:
1. Digital photography
2. Digital processing
3. Photo-sharing online
4. Self portraiture

1-3 are topics at the heart of the Pro Summit’s debates and discussions, photo-sharing being the newest factor which has been mentioned more than ever this year at the Summit as the popularity of sites like Flickr proliferate. Number 4, however, was the ‘Miss Aniela’ crux: the colour to my presentation and the selling point which made my presentation different to anything else during the event. Combined with 1-3, I was positing the whole process of ‘Miss Aniela’ (an alter-ego I began two and a half years ago at first without intention of creating ‘art’ or being an ‘artist’) as essentially offering control, complete independence and privacy over the whole image-making process.

I illustrated the presentation with many pics, describing along the way my exhibitions in 2007, 2008, various press I have had and where I think it was all going. To make my words as relevant as I could to other people, other artists, to the general photography scene and their speculation of the future of the art, I mentioned how last year Tate Britain had not only decided to put up digital photography in its gallery for the first time but actually collaborate with Flickr to invite members of the amateur photo-taking audience to submit their pics themed on Britain. (One of my own images was selected as one of the final 40 to go on display.) It is extremely interesting how this move by a prestigious institution suggests a blurring between traditional or established art, and the modern photo-sharing public. It maybe attempts to make the bold statement that amongst the hoards of photo-sharers, there are some ‘artists’.

I contrasted that attitude to how the press coined the term the ‘flickr photograph’ (The NY Times to be precise, re: a previous blog entry of mine, but I used their words not to rant, but to point out something interesting). The term suggests that photo-sharing and digital photography/enhancements go hand in hand, which I have likewise suggested in my own presentation. However, my stance is that this shouldn’t necessarily be to separate those photographs from the ‘real’ art world. By using examples of how my own work has been welcomed as part of art magazines, art galleries, and the homes of art collectors who traditionally buy paintings (well, at least one buyer I heard about) I wanted to show how maybe things are changing, that digital photography is being accepted. I also wanted to share the idea that although modern digital accoutrements may make the creation of photographs easier, as a consequence it makes it more difficult to be unique or interesting. Bringing the theme back to the predominant one of photo-sharing, I concluded that the viewership artists accrue on sites like Flickr rewards the hard work they put into their craft, strengthening the idea of democracy and that art is ‘made by ordinary people’. I wanted to show how the figure of ‘Miss Aniela’ can encourage the modern artist to celebrate the control digital photography offers and to have their say over what ‘art’ should be.

–Hmm, I’ve blabbered on a bit there but that’s the gist of my presentation. I think it fitted it nicely to other discussions going on during Day 1, such as Lise Gagne’s story of success on i-Stock and the general talk of the blurring between amateur and professional.

Some reviews of the 2008 Summit here:

Recap by John Harrington

PDN Pulse: Microsoft Targets Pro Photographers With Summit: Who Is Listening?
PDN Pulse: Is The Amateur The New Professional?
PDN Pulse: Pirates and Money and Bears, oh Microsoft!
Thomas Hawk: Microsoft’s 2008 Professional Photgraphy Summit and What Microsoft is Up to With Digital Photography (scroll down for that one - a few nice pics with it)
The mesmerised audience by Scobleizer

I can’t yet find a video of my presention though I heard the whole Summit was streamed live on Scobleizer’s (above) video site. If anyone finds one please let me know, thanks!

This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 22nd, 2008 at 11:49 pm and is filed under Exhibition/publicity-linked, Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.