News

» “Naked, turned on Lolita, who lies on a sofa”

April 18th, 2008

missweb.jpg

The article in El Pais! (see online here).

Some viewers told me that they disliked this article. I’ll discuss it in my next post when I also share some pics of the exhibition launch from Thursday night. For now I’d like you to make your mind up for yourself. Is this article a misrepresentation of ‘Miss Aniela’?

Translation (below) thanks to Eva (title quoted from Patricia Ossietta’s translation)

—-
“Photographic Self-Eroticism”

“A British artist’s success in the net posting intimate self-portraits.”

Beatriz Portinari - Madrid.

“Like other music bands and artists, her fame was born in Internet, via her Flickr-page, where millions of potential admirers share photographs. The enigmatic name Miss Aniela (www.flickr.com/photos/ndybisz/) had everything to become successful on the Net: she was a lolita who got naked in front of of her camera, with a sexy pose and flash, a bit of Photoshop, oniric light, clones … and the internet users at her feet.

“Her images made clear pictoric references to Balthus, sometimes even as a cinematographic recreation reinvented by herself. There is the excited woman on the coach, the relaxed and naked on the sofa, another one without clothes and in front of the window or cloned among the rocks. Behind the 477 photographes, seen by three million people since she opened her webpage two years ago, hides the British student Natalie Dybisz (Leeds, 1986), who opens tomorrow Self-gazing, her first exposition in Spain.

“In spite of the polemic her images usually provoke, criticised by feminist movements, Miss Aniela assures that each photograph has a reivindicative message, started in her youth with tricks of photos where she appeared kissing herself. “In that moment I started to read feminist literature and I wanted to express a certain kind of self-erotism, associated to what I felt in those moment. I wanted to celebrate being with myself”, explains the young woman, accused by some sectors of being narcissistic and by others of being pornographic and exhibitionist. The thing that started as a online diary where she wrote her thoughts with her daylife images became a more risky and daring work, with the danger of being censored loads of times, in the one where the illumination and the scenification are her allies. After participating in the collective exposition ‘How we are now’ last year in Tate Britain in London and becoming a reference of the main trend publications, Miss Aniela assures she wants to continue with her photographic nudism: “Everything comes from my passion to create powerfull and intriguing images, using the first model I have closer. So, why should I do something different now?”

“Self -gazing. From tomorrow in the gallery Camara Oscura. Alameda,16. Till 31st May.”

» Yo Dona

April 13th, 2008

I said I’d upload any publicity from the upcoming exhibition that I can get my hands on, so here is some..

This article was in Yo Dona magazine inside a well known Spanish newspaper yesterday. Published as an ‘exclusive’, they used a previously unpublished pic, At White Rock, as the main image.

Miss_Aniela___Yo_Dona_web.jpg

To see bigger, click here. Oh no - not showing up big at all. I’ll get Delarge to help out with a onsite version ASAP…

Here is a translation (only for amusement really, at the misquotations and slight misinformation regarding Tate Modern - it was actually Tate Britain, and my inclusion in the exhib was due to a Flickr competition, I didn’t exactly have my own exhibit!)

“MISS ANIELA
Portrait of a lady 2.0.

“She started showing her photographs in internet and inmediately she jumped to the first row. Now this young british launches her controversial work in our country. By Sandra F. Molina.

“There is a reserve of young artists prepared to follow the Young British Artists that Saatchi sponsored in the 90s. In that situation is placed Natalie Dybisz, coming from Leeds and just hit her twenties, who one day decided to change her diary written with ink for a digital camera and upload her self-portraits in internet. Suddenly, she became an artist. ‘People liked my work, they said I had a own-style and they wanted to interview me. But that wasn’t my plan. I didn’t even study photography! 12 months after uploading my first self-portrait I did my first exposition’. It was on Flickr, the photography - interchange online community, a new example of the future navegation web 2.0. which is used by 25 million people everyday. On the net, Miss Aniela (pronounced Ann-yella). ‘Everyone needs to be protected by an alter-ego’, she argues. ‘On the right hand, I wanted to pay tribute to my polish origins and, on the other hand, I wanted to use the Miss label. It was a way to represent myself as a single and independent woman, young and feminine’.

“In her self portraits, she uses narcissist dreams to clone herself continuously and exaggerate the sensuality and the erotsim, a style that has made her one of the most controversial photographer on the internet. Because there are no few people that have brand her work as pornographic. “The fact that people don’t still assume that the image of a nude woman doesn’t mean sex makes me angry, it doesn’t have negative connotations nor has to become a part of masculine fantasies. With my shots I try to express my sexuality, but no with the presence of a spectator but as an active desire entity, with my rights. What I am.” The work of Miss Aniela has opened an interesting debate about the female nudity and its place in art history.

“The references to Cindy Sherman’s work are obvious, but Natalie feels overwhelmed with that comparison. “My work is less obvious , I am not able to parody with so much style as she did. But I agree with the ideology of her images.” With such a direct speech, its not weird that Natalie has reached the recognition short time. Last year, the London Tate Modern opened its doors to her work, in a retrospective about the new photography, and now she comes to Madrid to show her work in Self-gazing, a exposition she defines as “An opportunity to show the diversity of my style, to show my my most risky side and, at the same time, most sensual”. But this is another step more in the World Domination Plan of Miss Aniela.

“Self-Gazing can be seen from 17th april till 31st May in Cámara Oscura Gallery, Madrid. (More info: www.camaraoscura.net)”

» Next Thursday (17th)

April 9th, 2008

(front and back of invitation:)
SELF-GAZING_1.jpg

My exhibition launches at 8pm at Camara Oscura Galeria de Arte, C/Alameda 16, Madrid (near Atocha metro). I’ll be there to sign autographs for everyone… joke.

If you want an invitation just drop a comment here or mail me. I’m not sure yet whether you need an invitation to get in. I’ll find out.

To see the images that will be in the exhib, click here.

Definitely won’t be buying one of those Easyjet bacon baps for breakfast on the plane like I did last time. Eurgh…

And by the way, I speak zilch Spanish. Even Hola fails to come out properly

» Top 5 current Flickr inspirations (and a bit of Flickr criticism)

April 7th, 2008

INSPIRATIONS3.jpg
Above: l-r, 5-1!

Ok, here’s my current ‘Top 5 flickr inspirations’. It comes as an odd time to write this, because at the moment I’m kind of pissed off with the Flickr community.
I fully appreciate my Flickr viewership, exemplified by the 170+ comments on my latest pic, ‘Their evening banter’. I consider this one of my best works and so to have so much feedback at least shows some promise that Flickr viewership can be trusted ;)) Most of those comments are meaningful and substantial, but the one that means the most to me by far is the one I received from the manager who let me use that hotel room. Therefore the comments mean more on a quality over quantity basis. I think Federico Erra came along and faved it. That means more than ten comments like “so beautiful !” that actually make me feel a little ill. What do they mean? I see that comment written on crappy pics all over Flickr, should I be flattered to receive it myself? Have you actually looked at the pic? Or do you just see a naked/’pretty’ woman and decide blindly that the highest superlative is needed?
Someone recently said that there’s none of that ’so beautiful’ nonsense on my blog. So this is the best place to write my critique.

I want to withdraw myself from Flickr a little bit because I’m bored of the childish behaviour coming from those who feel is necessary to sit down like a saddo and judge everyone, unfairly stereotyping and incriminating users for being snobby or untalented or any other derogatory term these bored-minded people can come up with.

However, I also want to withdraw myself from Flickr a bit precisely because there is some truth in what these people say. I just wish their vitriol was better aimed, or at least not so sweeping. Not everyone is an attention-seeking talentless poo round which sycophantic flies gather. However, I feel as if I am at the end of my tether with people on Flickr blatantly ripping me off, who don’t even realise it. They and their sycophants make me feel like the word ‘artist’ is being thrown around far too much in this, yes democratic, but ever so naive, cyberspace community where anyone can ‘make it’.
As I said in my first Inspirations post, I count a real artist as one who is honest about his or her inspirations, who makes no effort to hide them, in fact, who makes a special effort every now and then to highlight them, to name them and link to them so that viewers can put their work, and thus their originality, into context.
There are so-called ‘artists’ on Flickr who simplistically recycle the images they have previously seen and admired, taking praise for having created a great piece of ‘art’. It bothers me twice as much because I feel I am the only one who can recognise that I am amongst those being plagiarised.
Obviously all photographers/artists will have to put up with copycats for some time, or even all of the time. But this is why I have a problem with Flickr, because so many viewers and users, blind to where plagiarism has occurred, are eager to plant virtual kisses all over the arses of the amateurs spawned by the internet phenomenon. It seems to make it easier for them to make a unoriginal image and get away with it, to even get praised for it.

Here are the current inspirations.

5. Ilina S

NY-based Ilina has a great popping processed style that is right up my street. I think her most recent work is the mst impressive - I was bewitched by her Valentine’s post. Her face, skin and eyes come out wonderfully in her work, as in this pic. Her Flickr portfolio is quite small so I’d love to see more from her. I haven’t yet been directly inspired by one of her pieces, but her and Vaneska Thomz (further below) generally maintain my confidence to be brave and bold with post-processing.

4. Lara Swift
She’s in my first list too. Had to add her into both lists because she’s produced some corkers recently - like this one and this mermaid one. Her work is quite deathly and gothic even, but that doesn’t put me off because she seems more nonchalantly original than alot of similarly death-loving artists. I have also heard her mention she has depression, which makes her artistic intentions a little more meaningful.

3. Vaneska Thomz
Vanessa, like Ilina above, has a stream full of square-cropped boldly colour-paletted images that offer me courage as a digital photographer. ‘Air’ is amazing and I was directly inspired by this one of hers but never quite produced anything close to it. Her work uses alot of textures and can get quite surreal. I do prefer the simpler ones which I find more effective (same goes for my No. 1 below). Pictures with floaty garments like this one was part of my inspiration to do more with interesting clothing. I also love the soft processing, hair, setup and composition of her pic ‘elegantly wasted’.
A pic I did recently, ‘Party piece(s)’ was made with Vanessa in mind (I was flattered when she faved it) but I did not mention her because it was not directly inspired by any particular pic of hers.

2. Oladios
I’ll write her what I wrote in my testimonial for Oladios.
“I came across Ola’s weird and wonderful work one day through the Female Self Portrait Artists’ group and was immediately struck by how well she photographs her cats. What’s more, she captures them perfectly within the difficult feat of self portraiture! She becomes her own character within the quaint comic strip world of her images; a mysterious girl interacting with the animals who are placed as if by a paintbrush. This play between human and cat Oladios tells us is very much in the style of Balthus’ paintings, but Ola takes his nubile nude and replaces it with her clothed - and masked - self.

“Ola is one of the very few people on Flickr for whom I feel art is a special vocation, almost a divine power that comes from above, rather than from the influence of her peers such as on Flickr. Artists like Ola don’t worry about fitting in, they don’t try to master a certain level of photography in order to be accepted. They just get on with creating magic through what they are naturally good at - employing their superior sense of the visual.

“Whilst she may take inspiration from other artists, artists like Ola never seem to be copying an image or rendering photographic cliches as if there were a limited supply of ideas in self-portraiture. Instead, they take inspiration from selected diverse and obscure sources, in Ola’s case, those inspirations go from Balthus’ paintings to Nirvana lyrics.”

I haven’t been directly inspired by any of her pics as yet, but her work just generally fills me with a good feeling about photography. It’s weird when you realise that most of her pics on Flickr are taken in the same room, from the same angle, with the same subjects, and yet she can create a different surreal narrative every time, using some props and a crazy imagination!
My faves of her work are Jozin z basin and this one.

When I did my pic ‘Self portrait with Sally’ I mentioned the work of Ola with regards to keeping animals still and obedient during photoshoots. She not only seems to have control over them, but seems to have the power of a circus ringleader to even get them to do roll over and jump up!

1. Quizz
Bogna’s work impresses and excites me more than anything I’ve seen inside or even outside of Flickr.
Her work is like a modern-day classic art museum, a girl who uses her digital camera and Photoshop to create painting-like masterpieces that look more like photorealistic paintings.
My favourites of her work are most usually the ones with least use of ‘texture’ - that is, the ones that allude to paintings, with the subject unobscured by the addition of textured layers. My favourites include ‘Pillow book’, ‘Publications feel good’, ‘Read my lips’, and ‘Balancing on the edge of light’. I was lucky to do a collaboration with her - see her image here, mine here, though I’ve never met her (the collaboration was done digitally).
Quizz always inspires me but usually, when inspired, I end up creating something completely different, which is a good thing!
You can see the influence of Quizz in images of mine such as An impromptu performance and Bless this mess. She’s inspired me to try harder with motion and expression - a poetry of the body. As a result, I often look theatrical, as noticeable in They found themselves on stage.

Out of her recent work in my opinion the astounding image water, exceeds the level of most of the other more ‘popular’ images.

And that’s my 5.

Some more ones to watch:
Brady
What Milk
Sophie Charlotte (only young! some fantastic inspirational spritely work that inspired me recently)